On Aug. 23, 2024, the Ethereum Foundation made a significant transaction by transferring 35,000 ETH, valued at approximately $96.9 million based on current ether rates. The transaction sparked some criticism from the crypto community, with a few voices raising concerns about the foundation’s transparency. However, the foundation’s executive director quickly clarified that the transfer was simply a routine part of the nonprofit’s “treasury management activities.”
Ethereum Foundation Transfer Triggers Transparency Debate
Recently, the Ethereum Foundation (EF), a nonprofit committed to advancing Ethereum and its technologies, transferred 35,000 ETH, valued at $96.9 million. The funds were directed to a Kraken exchange deposit address, as identified by Arkham Intelligence’s explorer. The transaction caught attention on the platform X when Lookonchain shared details about the move. In response, one user voiced concerns over the foundation’s transparency in financial disclosures.
Related: Ethereum Update: ETH Surpasses $3,100 After 21 Days
“Financial disclosures or gtfo, Ethereum, seriously,” the person wrote. “How on earth is this an opportune time to do these kind of movements without as much as a peep?”
The Ethereum Foundation’s executive director responded to the X post. “This is part of our treasury management activities,” Aya Miyaguchi replied. “EF has a budget of ~$100m per year, which is largely made up of grants and salaries, and some of the recipients are only able to accept in fiat,” the nonprofit’s executive director added.
Miyaguchi further stated:
This year, there was a long period of time when we were advised not to do any treasury activities due to the regulatory complications, and we were not able to share the plan in advance. Also this transaction is not equal to a sale. There will be planned and gradual sales from here on.
Not everyone found Miyaguchi’s response satisfying. Gabriel Shapiro, a crypto attorney and co-founder of Metalex Labs, argued that despite the Ethereum Foundation (EF) spending $100 million each year, there’s a lack of clear direction in terms of maximizing the value of ether or even the Ethereum network as a whole.
“Enough is enough—this mentality is the biggest constraint on growth of the crypto industry as no one wants to invest in something with un-dependable value-drivers where those responsible for generating value to the asset are already too wealthy and have massive conflicts of interest,” Shapiro said. “Just look at the responses to Aya’s thread screenshotted below–people (retail ETH holders who serve as exit liquidity)—are pissed off.”
Aave-Chan Initiative founder Marc Zeller also expressed dissatisfaction with Miyaguchi’s statement. “100m$/year for what?” Zeller asked. “The Geth team, truly deserving, receives meager pay despite critical work. Once the Purge & Verge upgrades are delivered, it’s time to seriously consider defunding and dissolving the Ethereum Foundation,” he added.
As the Ethereum Foundation navigates criticism over its financial practices, the tension between transparency and operational necessity becomes more evident. While some see the foundation’s actions as essential for sustaining its mission, others question whether its spending aligns with the long-term growth and stability of the Ethereum network. The conversation around these decisions is likely far from over.
Source: Bitcoin
