The enforcement-heavy approach of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to crypto regulation is stifling innovation and leaving the market without clear standards, an SEC commissioner has warned. Criticizing the reliance on litigation, he argued that case-by-case enforcement delays the creation of a consistent regulatory framework, depriving investors and innovators of necessary guidance. He urged the agency to prioritize transparent rulemaking over penalizing bad actors.
SEC Commissioner Criticizes Enforcement-First Approach to Crypto Regulation
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Mark T. Uyeda raised significant concerns about the regulatory treatment of cryptocurrencies and digital assets at the Los Angeles County Bar Association’s 55th Annual Securities Regulation Seminar in Washington D.C. last week. Uyeda criticized the SEC’s reliance on enforcement actions, rather than clear rulemaking, as the main tool for regulating this emerging space.
“There has been a lack of regulatory guidance in the crypto space. Instead, regulatory policy has been promulgated through settled enforcement actions and positions taken in litigation,” he described, adding:
In my view, it would have been preferable for the Commission to have considered proposing rules or issuing interpretive guidance before resorting to enforcement.
The SEC commissioner emphasized that this approach leaves investors and innovators without the clear standards they need to operate confidently in the market.
Uyeda also highlighted the consequences of the SEC’s current strategy, pointing out that pursuing a case-by-case approach through enforcement actions prevents the creation of a consistent regulatory framework.
“Rather than proactively contributing to the creation of a body of law regarding cryptocurrencies and digital assets by setting definitional parameters ex ante, the SEC is instead pursuing a case-by-case approach through enforcement actions,” he detailed, elaborating:
As a result, it will take years to reach any type of legally binding precedent, as cases will need to wind their way through the judicial system before reaching a court of appeals. That type of delay is not helpful to either investors or innovators.
He argued that this method of regulation, while perhaps effective in penalizing bad actors, does not offer the clarity market participants require to ensure compliance. Uyeda called for more transparency from the SEC and urged the Commission to provide clearer guidelines for crypto and digital assets. “Instead of using enforcement actions to set regulatory policy, the SEC should provide greater transparency with respect to how it applies its own rules, especially in developing areas like cryptocurrencies and digital assets,” he concluded.
Source: Bitcoin
